PDA

View Full Version : Power flow calculations using Inverse Dynamics

rferdinands49
08-01-2003, 03:48 PM

I have completed many 3D multi-segment rigid body models of the human body to
calculate the joint (F*v) and muscle powers (M*w) during human movement. I am
familiar with Winter's work who emphasised the usefulness of this approach in
biomechanics. He believed that a typical power analysis would show the distinct
patterns of energy generation and absorption by the muscles, and this could have
significant implications for training and conditioning.

Winter's calculations are relatively simple. In his book "Biomechanics and
Motor Control of Human Movement (2nd Ed, 1990), he intially stated that muscle
power is the produce to net muscle moment (M) and angular velocity (w) yielding
the formula P = Mw, where P is power in watts. This power could be therefore
positive or negative depending on whether the muscles were performing a positive
rate of change or negative change of work. Hence the terms muscle power
generation and muscle power absorption were conceptualised mechanically. A
little later on Winter says that the aforementioned formula should be modified
to include the angular velocities of the adjacent segments in order to partition
the transfer component so that w is repaced by (w1 - w2) and the muscle power
equation now becomes P=M(w1-w2), where if w1 and w2 have the same polarity, the
rate of transfer is the lesser of the two power components.

In Zajac et al. (2002). Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking.
Part 1: Introduction to concepts, power transfer, dynamics and simulations. Gait
and Posture 16 (2002), 215-232, states the following:

(i) any one muscle may effect the acceleration and power of ALL body segments
because of dynamic coupling.

(ii)the net power instantaneously delivered by a muscle to either the segment of
origin or insertion must be found from COUPLED EQUATIONS OF MOTION and cannot be
found from the dot product of its force vector at the origin (insertion) with
the velocity vector of the origin (insertion) OR from the dot product of the net
joint moment vector with the segment angular velocity vector. The reason is that
the effects of the contributions of net joint moment to the joint intersegmental
forces and the muscle contributions to joint intersegmental forces are not
included.

(iii) It is often erroneously stated that or inferred that a muscle delivers
power to or absorbs power from only the segments to which it attaches.

(iv) This error (iii) seems to arise because of the lack of recognition that the
terms in the coupled dynamic equations are correct for computing muscle power to
the entire sustem, but incorrect when used separately to find the net
contribution to the segments to which they attach.

Therefore, I have the following questions that I would like resolved:

(a) From the inverse dynamics solution of two or more coupled rigid bodies, what
would the value of just the net joint torque multiplied the corresponding
segment angular velocity compute (i.e. just P = Tw)? Anything meaningful?

(b) If the net joint torque (from inverse dynamics) multiplied by the difference
in angular velocities of the adjacent segments was calculated would this
satifactorily give the values of THE TOTAL SUM OF active muscle power flows in
or out of the segment (i.e. P=T(w2-w1)). Is this always necessary or could
sometimes P=Tw used?

(c) Can joint muscle power or absorption be calculated accurately using Winter's
approach using the joint torques found from an inverse dynamics solution? Is
this what Winter meant or did he mean as in (ii) above? Is the methodology for
calculating power flows correct in Winter?

(d) Can the power flow equations easily applied to the 3D case since power is a
scalar quantity?

(e) How should power flows into or out of a segment be described taking into
account statement (iv) by Zajac et al. Does this mean that P=T(w2-w1) give the
net joint power which represents the SUMMED power by the net joint moment
to/from ALL the segments?

Your replies would be greatly appreciated, and a summary of replies posted.

Thank you.

Rene Ferdinands

Department of Physics &
Electronic Engieering
University of Waikato
Hamilton
New Zealand

---------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send SIGNOFF BIOMCH-L to LISTSERV@nic.surfnet.nl
For information and archives: http://isb.ri.ccf.org/biomch-l
---------------------------------------------------------------