Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The real Dempster

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The real Dempster

    I'm reviewing Dempster's 1955 data on the position of the centre of mass of
    different body segments. I've got a copy of the original report which
    appears to contain a couple of typographical errors (e.g. position of CM of
    lower leg with and without foot is identical). Winter (Biomechanics of Human
    Movement, John Wiley, 1979 p151) cites Dempster but gives different values
    which look more convincing (0.433 from knee without foot, 0.606 with).
    Winter cites the data as having come "via Miller and Nelson" or "via
    Plangenhoef".

    Does anyone out there have an explanation for this or know a reference for
    either Miller and Nelson or Plangenhoef?

    Thanks

    Richard

    Richard Baker PhD
    Gait Analysis Service Manager
    Musgrave Park Hospital, Stockman's Lane, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7JB
    Tel: +44 2890 669501 ext 2155 or 2849
    Fax: +44 2890 382008

    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe send SIGNOFF BIOMCH-L to LISTSERV@nic.surfnet.nl
    For information and archives: http://isb.ri.ccf.org/biomch-l
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
Working...
X