Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Replies: Impact testing of cortical bone

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Replies: Impact testing of cortical bone

    Dear list members:

    There were only a few replies to my question concerning impact testing of
    cortical bone, but there was some interest in reading the responses.

    Here is the original request:

    >===== Original Message From alex_depaula@mtf.org =====
    >Dear Biomechanics list:
    >
    >I am looking for information about falling-mass impact testing of cortical
    >bone or people with knowledge of impact testing of bone. Any type of
    impact
    >testing information could also be helpful (Izod, Charpy or other).


    Here are the 3 replies:

    #1)

    Dear Dr. DePaula:

    We have been impact testing bare bones and intact specimens for 15 years in
    our laboratories. However, we do not do the classical "metallurgical" types
    of test (Izod, Charpy, Rockwell, etc.). Our primary interest has been to
    study failure thresholds (e.g. force, energy, etc.) for various bones and
    intact specimens in order to understand mechanisms of injury and
    biomechanical
    design criteria. We have used accelerator-cart/guiderail systems and
    various
    drop towers in our research. Is there some specific information that you
    need? I would write more, but I am not sure what kind of information you
    are
    looking for... Do you want data? Are you interested in experimental
    methodolgy? Let me know, and I will see if I can help more.

    Sincerely,

    Tyler Kress, Ph.D.
    Associate Director
    Engineering Institute for Trauma & Injury Prevention
    The University of Tennessee

    Tyler A. Kress, Ph.D.
    The University of Tennessee
    (865)974-3333


    #2)
    Yamada in Evans (Ed) Strength of Biological Materials, Williams and Williams
    pub. 1970 lists the impact snapping strength of femoral cortical bone for
    adult human, horse, bovine in the radial and tangential directions. These
    data were collected using an Izod impact machine. Values are in lbf/in^2
    (mean +- SD):
    Human radial (12.13 +- 1.35)
    Human tangential (8.87 +- 0.98)
    Horse radial (10.27 +- 0.89)
    Horse tangential (10.73 +- 0.93)
    Bovine radial (9.80 +- 0.65)
    Bovine tangential (11.20 +- 0.84)

    Hope this helps.

    Richard Kent
    University of Virginia


    #3)
    Alex,

    We have been interested in more rigorously discriminating comminution
    patterns in high-energy injuries, based on fracture energy absorption. To
    create fractures in cortical bone segments, we use a drop tower apparatus
    that was constructed in our lab. We have also conducted tests of energy
    absorption in cortical bone beam specimens using a Balanced Hounsfield
    Impact Tester. (Some of this data is published in Beardsley et al, The Iowa
    Orthopaedic Journal, 20:24-30, 2000). I am also aware of an early paper by
    Bonfield and Datta (Journal of Applied Physics, 37:869, 1966) that reports
    on the fracture behavior of short beam compact bone specimens in a
    traditional Charpy test.

    I would be interested in reading other responses that you receive regarding
    this matter.

    Regards,

    Christina Beardsley
    ---------------------------------
    Christina L. Beardsley
    PhD candidate
    Orthopaedic Biomechanics Lab
    University of Iowa

    ______________________
    C. Alex DePaula, Ph.D.
    Product Development Scientist
    Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation
    125 May Street, Suite 300
    Edison, New Jersey 08837
    Direct: 732-661-2261
    Fax: 732-661-2360
    Email: alex_depaula@mtf.org

    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe send SIGNOFF BIOMCH-L to LISTSERV@nic.surfnet.nl
    For information and archives: http://isb.ri.ccf.org/biomch-l
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
Working...
X