Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Summary: RE: lower leg EMG

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Summary: RE: lower leg EMG

    To all list members,

    The following message was posted on Thursday 16-05-02:

    "I am searching for EMG studies of the lower leg muscles during running gait
    (and also during cycling as a lesser priority). There are an endless number
    of studies which have investigated tibialis anterior, gastroc and soleus
    function in varying contexts, but to my surprise I have found very few
    studies that investigate the activity of tibialis posterior, peroneus longus
    and brevis.

    I have searched web of science, Medline (full reference set) and sports
    discus. Interesting articles that I did find include:

    1.Reber, L., Perry, J., & Pink, M. (1993). Muscular control of the ankle in
    running. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 21, 805-810.

    2.Mann, R. A. (1986). Comparative electromyography of the lower extremity in
    jogging, running, and sprinting. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 14,
    501-510.

    Reber et al. used fine-wire EMG to investigate the function of gastroc,
    peroneus brevis (but not longus apparently), tib post, tib ant and soleus
    during running. Even in this study, few references were made to earlier
    studies that had recorded the patterning of muscles other than gastroc,
    soleus and tib ant.

    There appears to be some useful information in biomechanics and sports
    medicine textbooks in relation to running, and these I am still searching.
    But if anybody has any further articles/sources that may be useful, these
    would be much appreciated.

    thank you for your time

    I am more than happy to provide a summary of responses if others are
    interested."
    -----
    Following is a summary of responses:

    "You are correct with your statement that there are very few studies that
    investigate the activity of tibialis posterior, peroneus longus and
    brevis in running. This may be partly due to the fact that the tibialis
    posterior and peroneus brevis cannot be easily measured using surface
    electrodes. I am currently conducting a running study and I do have data
    for the peroneus longus muscle during overground running (9000 trials at
    4 m/s). However, I am still in the process of analysing the data so if
    you could provide me with more detailed information of what it is you
    are looking for I might be able to help you out.

    Best regards,
    Anne
    ________________________________________________
    A n n e M u e n d e r m a n n
    Ph.D. Candidate Medical Science (Biomechanics)
    Human Performance Laboratory
    University of Calgary
    Phone (403) 220-2802
    Fax (403) 284-3553
    Email ahau@kin.ucalgary.ca"
    ---------
    "Using the EMG for muscle activity study will depend on the function of
    muscles, major active muscles, and study you are interested. and for surface
    emg, the size and location of muscle interested. There is no surprised that
    most of researchers focused on TA, GAS, and soleus since they are the major
    ones. For instance my study of Down's gait and put surface EMG on Gastroc,
    Peroneus B & L, TA, if the force three muscles are active during the same
    gait cycle period , there is no sense to place on all of them.
    Please refer Dynamics of Human Gait by Dr. Christopher Vaughan Chapter 4."

    Dr. S.W. Yang [swyang@bme.ym.edu.tw]
    -----
    "http://guardian.curtin.edu.au/cga/data/

    see the entry by At Hof

    =====
    Dr. Chris Kirtley MD PhD
    Associate Professor
    Dept. of Biomedical Engineering
    Catholic University of America
    620 Michigan Ave NE, Washington, DC 20064
    Tel. 202-319-6247, fax 202-319-4287
    Email: kirtley@cua.edu"
    -----
    "You are absolutely correct, there are not enough dynamic studies assessing
    tibialis posterior simply because it is pretty difficult to detect its
    muscle activity using surface electrodes. The only way would be by either
    using needle or wire electrodes and you would not have control subjects or
    patients volunteering for the study. I tried to do this in 1991 and tried
    the needle electrodes on myself and it was very very painful. I have not
    since then tried to do so but I would be very interested to hear the replies
    to see if anybody has found a painless way to measure it under dynamic
    activity. You might be interested in the article I published two years ago:

    Lower Limb Muscle Dysfunction May Contribute to Foot Ulceration in Diabetic
    Patients, Clinical Biomechanics (2000), 15(1), 37-45. R J Abboud, D I
    Rowley, R W Newton

    Dr R J Abboud
    Master of Orthopaedic Surgery (MCh Orth) Course Director
    Director, Foot Pressure Analysis Laboratory/Clinic"

    -----

    Andrew Chapman
    BPhty(Hons.)(UQ)
    PhD Candidate
    Department of Physiotherapy
    The University of Queensland
    St. Lucia, 4072, QLD, Australia.

    and

    Department of Physical Therapy
    Australian Institute of Sport
    P.O.Box 176
    Belconnen, 2616, ACT, Australia.

    email: andrewchapman@ozemail.com.au
    phone: + 61 2 6214 7943
    fax: + 61 2 6214 7953
    mobile: + 61 438 115 605

    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe send SIGNOFF BIOMCH-L to LISTSERV@nic.surfnet.nl
    For information and archives: http://isb.ri.ccf.org/biomch-l
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
Working...
X