Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Summary - Reference for 1M Gait Cycles/Year

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Summary - Reference for 1M Gait Cycles/Year

    Dear Colleagues,

    Thanks to the many responders! Following is a quick summary of replies...

    The original question was:
    In analysis of lower extremity biomechanics it is common to assume 1e6
    gait cycles per year. I have many papers in which this number is noted. It
    seems to have become so common that authors in recent literature no
    longer provide reference for the number. Would you please remind me of the
    early reference for this assumption?

    -------------------
    The winning response in the humor category...
    -------------------
    I was in NYC this weekend. On the subway, I noticed an ad for Dr. Shoals or
    something which proclaimed that "the average foot takes 10,000 steps per
    day". Or 3.5 million/year. I was skeptical, though I don't think this
    considers elderly and/or THR patients.

    Shoals, Dr. "The average foot takes 10,000 steps per day": Uptown 6 Train.
    2002 Nov 23.
    -------------------
    Other references...
    -------------------
    Wallbridge N, Dowson D."The walking activity of patients with artificial
    hip joints" J Engineering in Medicine 1982 11:95-96

    Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Northfield MR, Akizuki KH, Frankel RE,
    Belcher G,
    Amstutz HC. Quantitative assessment of walking activity after total hip
    or knee replacement. JBJS. 1998 80-A:54-59.

    Silva M, Shepherd EF, Jackson WO, Dorey FJ, Schmalzried TP.
    Average patient walking activity approaches 2 million cycles per year:
    pedometers under-record walking activity.
    J Arthroplasty. 2002 Sep;17(6):693-7.

    Work by Don Kettelkamp in the early to mid 70's

    1Mcycles per year is probably an underestimate, if you take into
    account **ALL** activities (i.e. including gait, small steps in
    indoor activities, a.s.o.) of an active subject. The most recent
    estimates I am aware of are those of Morlock et al, published on
    J.Biomech in 2001.

    Seedhom et al., Wear 24:35-51, 1973


    Thanks very much to all who responded!

    Tony Petrella

    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe send SIGNOFF BIOMCH-L to LISTSERV@nic.surfnet.nl
    For information and archives: http://isb.ri.ccf.org/biomch-l
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
Working...
X