Tweet
----------------------------- Start of body part 1
I apologize because I made a mistake in the anterior message. The muscular
origin is by different proportion fleshy and APONEUROTIC no tendinous.
Thank you.
----------------------------- Start of forwarded message 1
Delivery-Date: 8 Oct 93 17:23 +0100
From: ecolevol1
To: Biomch-l@hearn.bitnet (confirm)
Message-ID:
Subject: muscular mechanics
Return-Receipt-To: ecolevol1
Dear subscribers,
I am currently working on ecomorphology of shorebirds (mainly
related with terrestrial locomotion), combining musculoskeletal data with
behavioural and ecological data. Because I have found differences in the
proportion of tendinous and fleshy origin in the same muscle in different
species. I wonder if somebody could explain me which are the mechanical
differences in force output from different proportion of fleshy and
tendinous at the muscle origin.
Thank you.
ANDRES BARBOSA
E-MAIL: Carrascal@cc.csic.es
----------------------------- End of forwarded message 1
I apologize because I made a mistake in the anterior message. The muscular
origin is by different proportion fleshy and APONEUROTIC no tendinous.
Thank you.
----------------------------- Start of forwarded message 1
Delivery-Date: 8 Oct 93 17:23 +0100
From: ecolevol1
To: Biomch-l@hearn.bitnet (confirm)
Message-ID:
Subject: muscular mechanics
Return-Receipt-To: ecolevol1
Dear subscribers,
I am currently working on ecomorphology of shorebirds (mainly
related with terrestrial locomotion), combining musculoskeletal data with
behavioural and ecological data. Because I have found differences in the
proportion of tendinous and fleshy origin in the same muscle in different
species. I wonder if somebody could explain me which are the mechanical
differences in force output from different proportion of fleshy and
tendinous at the muscle origin.
Thank you.
ANDRES BARBOSA
E-MAIL: Carrascal@cc.csic.es
----------------------------- End of forwarded message 1