Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Summary: Surface EMG electrodes under pressure

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Summary: Surface EMG electrodes under pressure

    Hi,

    Here is a summary of responses regarding my query on methods of reducing
    noise and signal loss from EMG measurements underneath a knee brace. It
    seems that others with similar problems caused by shear and axial pressure
    on electrodes have tried low profile electrodes or ones with connectors not
    directly over the recording area. Alternatively, pressure can be relieved
    from the electrodes by high density foam placed around the electrodes so the
    brace sits on the foam instead of the electrode. Based on some suggestions,
    we have ordered Ambu neuroline 700 electrodes which have a lead instead of a
    snap connector. We have also tried a Delsys system and did not have any
    problems.
    Much thanks to all that responded,

    Veronica Naing
    Simon Fraser University

    .................................................. ...........
    I ve been using the biometrics EMG system with elite downhill skiiers, i
    have been fixing the elecrtodes to VL and VM, and Peroneus Longus, the
    skiiers then put a thermals and an extremly tight catsuit over the top -
    so far the results have been good and i dont get too much nosie.
    sometimes the cause of noise is the electrodes being placed too close
    together and "crosstalking"?
    also are you sure the electrodes arnt moving around under the brace - as
    electrode movement creates a massive amount of noise.
    Have a look at the biometrics system - i would recommend it.
    charlotte elsworth
    celsworth@brookes.ac.uk
    .................................................. ...........

    Maybe you can try to fix
    the electrode with some kind of elastic tapping material. We did some sports
    projects, used elastic tape for athletics, Johnson & Johnson Co. But that
    costs a lot.

    On the other hand, the earlier discussed issue on [BIOMCH-L], EMG noise on
    treadmill, for your reference to decrease the noise during data collecting.

    Regards,
    Pan Hui-Fen, M.S., P.T.
    a066038@apple.cmu.edu.tw
    .................................................. ...........

    I used the Noraxon system for 18 months during walking experiments and noise
    from electrode lead movement was a problem. I minimized the noise with
    careful taping of the lead. The trick was to prevent leads from hitting
    other structures but not taped so tightly that mechanical stretch caused
    another source of noise.

    Recently I have been using a Bortec system and it is much less sensitive to
    lead noise. Taping the lead is a cursory exercise now.

    I don’t have the added problem of braces fixed over the electrodes.

    I doubt you can fully solve the latter problem unless you position the
    electrodes away from the braces.

    If that is not possible, and the braces are large enough in diameter, you
    could try a layer of 10mm thick high density foam on the inside of the brace
    and leave a gap where the electrodes are positioned.

    Jim
    j-stinear@northwestern.edu
    .................................................. ...........
    Hi Veronica,

    I have experienced similar problems when recording EMG when subjects
    walking while wearing different types of knee and ankle braces. There
    were a couple of things we did that help with the problem. First we
    used low-profile disposable sticker electrodes. I am not sure what type
    of electrode you are using but the thicker plastic electrodes did not
    handle shear forces well. Second we bought a sheet of thick foam that
    was sticky on one side. We cut strips of this foam and placed it around
    the electrodes so that the brace would sit on the foam rather then
    directly on the electrode. We also tried making more ridgid plastic
    coverings for the eletrodes but this was not more effective then the
    thick foam strips. Finally when possible we modified our braces so that
    they would have openings where we were going to place the electrodes.
    These things helped but getting good EMG signals from under a tight
    fitting brace was always a lot of work.

    Keith
    kegordon@umich.edu
    .................................................. ...........
    Hi Veronica,

    When recording surface EMG from
    superficial muscles underneath a brace or AFO, to minimize movement
    artifact we routinely use conventional disposable non-preamplified
    electrodes in conjunction with the usual preamplifier-equippped
    electrode supplied with our EMG system. We secure the non-preamplified
    electrodes (e.g., VIASYS Neurocare) over the site of interest with BSN
    Medical (formerly Biersdorf) Cover-Roll Stretch Tape. (This product,
    while expensive, was the hands-down winner after an epic search to find
    the optimal skin prep tape.) We attach the preamplified electrode (in
    our case, Motion Lab Systems) nearby, mounted upside down with the
    transducer surfaces exposed. The brace itself often provides a
    convenient rigid, stable site for mounting this electrode. Trim the
    output leads from the plain electrodes to an appropriate length, strip
    the insulation from the last centimeter, and tape the bare ends against
    the respective + and - transducer faces on the preamp'd electrode.
    Secure everything with the same stretchy pre-wrap that athletic trainers
    use when taping ankles.

    When working with tall thermoplastic AFO's, alternatively we'll merely
    cut out access windows of the appropriate size and location so that we
    can use the usual preamplifier-equipped electrode; however, this
    solution probably won't apply to your knee brace mounted device. Good luck!

    Terry Horn, Ph.D
    Director, MRC Motion Analysis & Human Performance Laboratory
    gaitdr@MMRCREHAB.ORG
    .................................................. ...........
    Dear Veronica,

    is the brace device passive or active? In case it is active, I am
    wondering if the device is interfering with EMG electrodes because they
    are not shielded. I am not sure if you would gain an increase signal to
    noise ratio by some sort of shielding of the electrodes. However, this
    might not be possible.

    One other possible source of interference is also some capacitive
    effects between the electrodes and the brace. This might affect the
    recording by picking up some external electromagnetic field in the
    room. Some times a preamplifier before the acquisition board might
    reduce the effect of this.

    Massimo.
    mac50@pitt.edu

    .................................................. ...........
    Veronica, insulate the electrodes...go to an electrical dept or store and
    ask for some insulating tape. It's proper name is friction tape. It
    doesn't stick very well, but unless the noise is caused because the
    electrode is moving, it should help isolate the 'trodes and stop the noise
    that might be caused because the brace itself is linking the 'trodes.
    K
    jkmiller37067@yahoo.com
    .................................................. ...........
    Veronica,

    IS there any metal in the knee brace? If so, this
    may be attracting EMF. As well, do you get the same effect if you press the
    sensors to the skin hard and jiggle them a bit? IF so, then what your seeing
    is called biomechanical noise OR motion artifact. I know it seems weird
    cause the brace should hold the sensor in place but that's precicley the
    problem. The skin stretches, bends and contorts as someone moves around.
    Typically, a sensor attached with double sided tape is left to move with the
    skin the relative tension/shear between the two is close to zero. However,
    with the brace in place the skin still moves but the sensor is held by the
    brace. Hence, relative tension shear between the skin and the sensor creates
    the artifact.

    Geoff Desmoulin
    gdesmoulin@hotmail.com
    .................................................. ...........
    I haven't worked with your system but it seems as if you have an isolation
    problem. Either one of the components is generating noise and the noise is
    making it into the 1200 when you tighten the brace or the tightening is
    bridging two of the linear amp input circuits in the 1200.

    I just had a few ideas or questions that you might think about:

    Could the brace be making electrical contact with one of the electrodes or
    one of the lead wires and causing a spurious crossover between two of the
    pre-amp circuits in the 1200?

    Could the brace be pressing a worn wire up against the skin of the subject
    and letting ground or treadmill noise enter the 1200?

    Does the noise continue if the treadmill is turned off and the subject walks
    in place?

    Is the subject holding on to a non-grounded support rod?

    Is the 1200 grounded to the same ground as the treadmill?

    Does the noise continue if the treadmill is unplugged?

    Does the noise continue if the fluorescent lights are turned off?

    Is the spark suppressor on the treadmill's DC motor not working?

    Wrapping the entire leg with an insulating blanket of some type, even thick
    newspaper, would help you determine which part of securing the brace is
    causing the problem. If you use newspaper and there is no noise, then you
    can tear away sections of the insulating paper and localize the problem.

    Regards,

    Ted Andresen
    Tjacmc@aol.com
    .................................................. ...........

    1) What is the typical impedance condition? In difficult measurement
    conditions it is very important to make a good skin preparation. The
    impedance should be below 10 KOhm - see ABC of EMG.


    2) Which electrode type is used?
    Pressure artifact can not be solved by changing the EMG system. Most
    important is the selection of a proper electrode. One that may work fine
    is the AMBU QR electrode, which is flat and has no snap connection near
    the electrode but a thin cable:

    AmbuR Blue Sensor

    Description

    The medium-size, radio translucent Ambu Blue Sensor QR features highly
    conductive wet gel, superior adhesion, and a large measuring area to
    ensure optimal signal quality during medium-term applications. Thanks to
    the special occlusive backing material, the electrode will not absorb
    liquids. The QR is only available with pre-attached lead wires.
    Features

    http://www.ambu.com/ambu/Final.nsf/(pubid)/i91BCC5F1C7C9AD69C1256ED6003C
    E800i645AF5538F35DF4AC1256ED600490F9Ei5FEFAB67CACB F17BC1256ED6004CF769?O
    pen&SubName=&ParentName=MRI%20and%20X-ray
    Hope that helps - best regards Peter
    Todd.shewman@noraxon.com
Working...
X