Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Summary of Replies - Optimum hip and knee joint angles forgenerating power

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Summary of Replies - Optimum hip and knee joint angles forgenerating power

    Hi All,
    Many thanks to all of those that responded to my original question of the optimum knee and hip angles for development of force and power. Its still appears to be an area that there has been little conclusive research into the exact combination of joints that produce the great force output or rate of force development over a large movement range. I have added the reply summaries onto this email.

    Original Query:

    I am interested in the results of any research into the optimum knee and hip joint angles for generating explosive power from a static position (or combinations of hip and knee joint angles if this has been investigated). I am also interested in approximate percentage decrement as you deviate from these angles (eg. is there say a 20% decrement in rate of force development with a 30 degree change in knee joint angle???). This has particular relevance to numerous sporting situations such as the dive start position in swimming and the rugby scrummaging set position. Any information would be appreciated and a summary of replies will be sent out.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Replies:

    This article looks at pedal crank lengths, but reports on corresponding power outputs and hip/knee/ankle angles. Hope it proves helpful.

    Too, D. & Landwer, G.E. (2000) The effect of pedal arm crank length on joint angle and power production in upright cycle ergometry. Journal of Sport Sciences, 18, 153-161.

    Regards,

    Stephen Dixon
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    My name is Stepehn Cousins I am a Research Fellow at the University of East
    London. I have done numerous research projects on the sprint start, much has
    been investigated on optimum hip, knee and ankle angle angles in order to
    increase force output during the sprint start (as this is seen as the
    defining characteristic in measuring start performance). It has been stated
    that knee angles between 90-120 degrees, hip angles between 35-45 degrees
    and ankles angles of between 80-115 degrees can optimise the force output
    during the performance of a sprint start. I don't have these articles at the
    moment but I've listed ones that might be of use to you below.
    I hope this helps. I would be very interested to read about any findings you
    make.
    Stephen Cousins

    Atwater, A. (1982). Kinematic Analysis of Sprinting. Track and Field
    Quarterly Review. 82(8), 12-16.
    Baumann, W. (1976) Kinematic and dynamic characteristics of the sprint
    start. In: Biomechanics VB. P.V.Komi (Ed). Baltimore: University Park Press,
    194-199.
    Cousins and Dyson (2004). Forces at the front and rear blocks during the
    sprint start. XXIInd International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sport,
    198-201.
    Harland and Steele (1997). Biomechanics of the Sprint Start. Journal of
    Sports Medicine, 23(1), 11-20.
    Jackson and Cooper (1972). Effects of hand spacing and rear knee angle on
    the sprinters start. Reasearch Quarterly. 43(3), 378-382.
    Mendoza and Schollhorn (1993). Trainig of the sprint start technique with
    biomechanical feedback. Journal of Sports Sciences. 15(2), 149-152.
    Mero, Luhtanen and Komi (1983). A biomechanical study of the sprint start.
    Scandinavian Lournal of Sports Sciences. 5(1), 20-28.
    Roberstson (1986). Contributions to the ankle and knee muscles on sprint
    starting. Proceedings of the North Americam Congress on Biomechanics, 2,
    235-236.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Its an interesting question but I have never read any such research
    regarding specific sports. I imagine it would be fraught with difficulties.

    There is a lot of research regarding force and power out put of hip and knee
    using dynamometers http://www.springerlink.com/index/U40Q84X505982207.pdf
    is a link to one for instance. But to find more just search using key words
    knee hip power force dynamometer.

    Using force plate and 3D video would be another way of characterising max
    grf force v's limb position during a certain action of interest. Max force would = max acceleration and therefore max power perhaps.

    Just my thoughts but I think it would first be useful to define what is
    meant by explosive power.
    Power = rate of work 'explosive' is redundant since this implies a massive
    increase in work rate ie power.
    Perhaps you could be looking for an explosive increase in force. Force =
    mass x acceleration since it is unlikely the mass of the athlete will change
    perhaps you are looking for rapid acceleration of the body mass. For example it is usual in biomechanics of gait to measure power at the
    joint of interest and is defined as a scalar product of ang velocity x
    moments. This sounds useful but only really gives comparative data. This is
    because even if the muscle is producing a lot of force it is not necessarily
    causing a joint rotation ie isometric contraction. This type of muscle force
    may be very useful in a rugby scrum but not so useful in a dive from the
    pool side.

    Do you want the power to move a small mass over a long distance or ar large
    mass over a short distance in a given time.

    Perhaps you could ask what ankle, knee and hip joint angles produces the
    highest acceleration of the body mass.
    So therefore you could reach the required terminal velocity in the shortest
    time. These angles may be dependent on the direction of the force required.
    For instance pressing a weight above the head would require max vertical
    force but a American football player would require max force in the
    horizontal plane to stop a running forward player.

    There is data about the relation of muscle length v's muscle force however
    this has many variables such as concentic v's eccentric contraction. If one
    could define the optimum force / length out put of a certain muscle of
    interest then it may be possible to equate that to a joint angle, however
    one would first have to define the firing times and magnitude of that muscle
    or group of muscles and this is a very grey area.

    In jumping/ bouncing activities the force is often generated by elastic
    energy of large tendons eg achilles tendon.
    Power lifters though increase force and power by increasing the efficiency
    and size of the muscle, olympic lifters use a combination of both. .

    Cheers Dave Smith
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regarding a study by Ken Quarrie (New Zealand Rugby Union) on force production during scrummaging:
    They did not find much of a relationship between body alignment and the force that players were able to produce on an instrumented scrum machine.

    The mean angles at the ankle, knee and hip of individuals when pushing on the scrum machine were 282 * 11, 108 * 13 and 237 * 25 respectively. The correlations of the ankle, knee and hip angles to individual scrummaging force were 0.2, 0.02 and -0.28 respectively. Subsequently, the effect of interactions between each of the angles on scrummaging force were examined. This was to see whether an 'optimal' combination of angles for producing scrum force existed (the idea being that angles less than or greater than a certain optimal joint angle may have reduced force production). No combination of ankle, knee and hip angles was able to account for a significant proportion of variation in the force, nor did higher order interactions (quadratic terms) of a single joint bear a significant relationship to scrummaging force.

    It may have been that there was not that much variation in position (I don't have a feel any more for how much of a difference the reported variability in position actually represents) because players were typically well coached and adopted similar positions. Had we constrained the players to particular positions we may well have seen some relationship.

    Ken Quarrie

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Conrad Pearson (siliconCOACH Ltd - Australia) investigated the effects of changing knee and hip flexion angles and squat jump performance. Sixteen competitive swimmers (7 male, 9 female) had their squat jump performances tested over a range of knee and hip angle combinations. Knee angles ranged from 140 degrees to 80 degrees, hip angles ranged from 140 degrees to 65 degrees with changes in 15o increments. Based on the findings of this study it was concluded that:
    * The greatest jump heights for males were obtained using a knee angle of 95 degrees and a hip angle of 80 degrees.
    * Females reached their greatest jump height at a knee angle of 140 degrees and a hip angle of 80 degrees.
    * Increases in hip and knee flexion generally elicited increases in jump height and movement time and decreased peak force.
    * Reaction time and movement time did not differ between any of the joint angle combinations (p > 0.05).
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Andrew Lyttle

    Sports Biomechanist
    Western Australian Institute of Sport
    alyttle@wais.org.au
Working...
X