Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Neural Transplantation: BBS Call for Commentators

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Neural Transplantation: BBS Call for Commentators

    BBS Special Issue CONTROVERSIES IN NEUROSCIENCE II: Neural Transplantation

    Below are the abstracts of 3 forthcoming target articles for a special
    issue on Neural Transplantation that will appear in Behavioral and Brain
    Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal that
    provides Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current
    research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. This will be the
    second in a new series called "Controversies in Neuroscience,"
    undertaken in collaboration with Paul Cordo and the RS Dow Neurological
    Science Institute.

    Commentators must be current BBS Associates or nominated by a current
    BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator on any of these
    articles, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information
    about how to become a BBS Associate, please send email to:
    harnad@clarity.princeton.edu or harnad@pucc.bitnet or write to:
    BBS, 20 Nassau Street, #240, Princeton NJ 08542 [tel: 609-921-7771]

    Please specify which article or articles you would like to comment on.
    (Commentators are allotted 1000 words to comment on one article, 1750
    words to comment on two, and a maximum of 2250 words to comment on all
    three target articles.) To help us put together a balanced list of
    commentators, please give some indication of the aspects of the topic
    on which you would bring your areas of expertise to bear if you were
    selected as a commentator.

    Within the next week or so, electronic drafts of the full text of each
    article will be available for inspection by anonymous ftp, archie,
    gopher or versonica on host princeton.edu directory pub/harnad/BBS
    according to the instructions that follow after the abstracts. These
    drafts are for inspection only; please do not prepare a commentary
    until you are formally invited to do so.

    1. NEURAL TRANSPLANTATION AND RECOVERY OF COGNITIVE FUNCTION
    John D. Sinden, Helen Hodges & Jeffrey A. Gray
    Filename: bbs.sinden

    2. FETAL BRAIN TISSUE GRAFTS AS THERAPY FOR BRAIN DYSFUNCTIONS
    Donald G. Stein & Marylou M. Glasier
    Filename: bbs.stein

    3. GENE REPLACEMENT THERAPY IN THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
    Edward A.Neuwelt, Michael A. Pagel, Leslie L. Muldoon & Alfred Geller
    Filename: bbs.neuwelt

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    1.
    NEURAL TRANSPLANTATION AND RECOVERY OF COGNITIVE FUNCTION

    John D. Sinden, Helen Hodges & Jeffrey A. Gray
    Department of Psychology
    Institute of Psychiatry
    De Crespigny Park Denmark Hill
    London SE5 8AF England
    spjtjds@ucl.ac.uk
    jgray@ux.psych.lon.ac.uk

    KEYWORDS: Cholinergic system, cerebral ischaemia, cognitive function,
    diffuse versus point-to-point neuronal systems, neural grafts.

    ABSTRACT: Cognitive deficits were produced in rats using different
    methods of damaging the brain: chronic ingestion of alcohol, causing
    widespread damage to diffuse cholinergic and aminergic projection
    systems; lesions (by local injection of the excitotoxins, ibotenate,
    quisqualate and AMPA) to the nuclei of origin of the forebrain
    cholinergic projection system (FCPS), which innervates the neocortex
    and hippocampal formation; transient cerebral ischaemia, producing
    focal damage, especially in the CA1 pyramidal cells of the dorsal
    hippocampus; and lesions (by local injection of the neurotoxin,
    colchicine) to the granule cells of the dentrate gyrus. Following
    chronic alcohol or lesions of the FCPS, transplants of cholinergically
    rich fetal brain tissue into the terminal areas (neocortex or
    hippocampus) restored performance almost to control levels, with a
    time-course consistent with growth of the transplants and integration
    with host tissue; transplants of cholinergically poor fetal tissue
    (hippocampus) were without effect, as were transplants of
    cholinergically rich tissue into the region containing the nuclei of
    origin of the FCPS. Grafts of primary cells enriched in glia and
    cultured neuroblastoma cells into the terminal areas of the FCPS were
    equally effective, suggesting that there are multiple mechanisms by
    which neural transplants can restore cognitive function following
    diffuse cholinergic damage. In contrast, after ischaemia- or
    neurotoxin-induced damage to CA1 or dentate granule cells respectively,
    cholinergically rich fetal transplants into the damaged hippocampal
    formation were ineffective in restoring performance. However, after
    ischaemic damage, performance was restored by suspension grafts of CA1
    cells but not by transplants containing CA3 pyramidal cells or granule
    cells; and after colchicine damage, performance was restored by solid
    grafts containing granule but not CA1 pyramidal cells. Furthermore,
    electrophysiological evidence has demonstrated functional, graft
    type-specific host-graft fuctional neuronal connectivity. Thus,
    restoration of cognitive function by neural transplants is possible
    after damage to either diffuse (cholinergic) or point-to-point
    (intrahippocampal) forebrain systems, but the transplant must be
    appropriate to the damage to be repaired. Since the different types of
    brain damage studies provide partial analogues of human alcoholic
    dementia, Alzheimer's disease and heart attack, these results are
    encouraging with regard to the eventual application of neural
    transplant surgery to the treatment of cognitive deficits in humans.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    2.
    FETAL BRAIN TISSUE GRAFTS AS THERAPY FOR BRAIN DYSFUNCTIONS:
    SOME PRACTICAL AND THEORETICAL ISSUES

    Donald G. Stein & Marylou M. Glasier
    Laboratory of Brain Research and CNS Plasticity
    Institute of Animal Behavior
    Rutgers University
    Newark, NJ 07102
    stein@draco.rutgers.edu

    KEYWORDS: Brain damage; functional recovery; grafts; neural grafts;
    neural transplants

    ABSTRACT: Grafting embryonic neural tissue into the brains of adult
    patients is currently being used to treat Parkinson's disease and is
    being given serious consideration as therapy for a variety of other
    degenerative and traumatic disorders. This target article evaluates the
    use of transplants to promote recovery from brain injury and highlights
    the kinds of questions and problems that must be addressed before this
    form of therapy is routinely applied. It has been argued that neural
    transplantation can promote functional recovery through the replacement
    of damaged nerve cells, the reestablishment of specific nerve pathways
    lost as a result of injury, the release of specific neurotransmitters,
    or the production of factors that promote neuronal growth. The latter
    two mechanisms, which need not rely on anatomical connections to the
    host brain, are open to examination through nonsurgical, less intrusive
    therapy. Subjective judgments in selecting which patients will receive
    grafts and in assessing the outcome of graft therapy make evaluation of
    the procedure methodologically difficult. In addition, little long-term
    assessment of transplant efficacy and effect has been done in nonhuman
    primates. Carefully controlled human studies, with multiple testing
    paradigms, are also needed to establish the efficacy of transplant
    therapy.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    3.
    GENE REPLACEMENT THERAPY IN THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM:
    VIRAL VECTOR MEDIATED THERAPY OF GLOBAL NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE

    Edward A.Neuwelt, Michael A. Pagel, Leslie L. Muldoon
    Oregon Health Sciences University,
    Portland OR 97201

    Alred Geller
    Children's Hospital
    Boston, MA 02115

    KEYWORDS: adenovirus; blood-brain barrier; gene therapy; herpes
    virus; pHexosaminidase

    ABSTRACT: This target article describes the current state of global
    gene replacement in the brain through the use of viral vectors and it
    assesses possible solutions to some of the many problems inherent in
    gene therapy for the central nervous system (CNS). Gene replacement
    therapy is a way to generate normal human proteins in deficient cells,
    making cures possible for certain genetically inherited enzyme
    deficiences, metabolic diseases, and cancers. The two major issues to
    be addressed are the delivery of genetic material to the brain and the
    expression of recombinant genetic material in CNS target cells. Focal
    inoculation of recombinant virions or other genetic vectors has
    limitations when there is global brain disease. A new
    blood-brain-barrier (BBB) disruption technique, in which hypertonic
    mannitol transiently shrinks the BBB endothelium, allows the passage of
    high molecular weight compounds and even viruses. CNS gene therapy will
    require a viral vector system that allows long-term, nontoxic gene
    expression in neurons or glial cells. Retroviral vectors have
    limitations in CNS gene replacement, although they are suitable for
    expressing recombinant genes in intracerebral grafts, or toxic genes in
    brain tumors. Mutant neurotropic viruses with reduced neurotoxicity
    (e.g., defective herpes simplex virus type 1 [HSV-1], the HSV-1
    amplicon vector system we have developed, or adenovirus mutants) have
    potential for direct treatment of neurons. Injecting these vectors into
    rodent brains can lead to the stable expression of foreign genetic
    material in postmitotic neuronal cells. We discuss our BBB disruption
    delivery technique, our defective HSV-1 aplicon vector system, and our
    feline model for the neuronal lysosomal storage disorder
    Gm2-gangliosidosis (Sandhoff disease), which may prove to be a useful
    model system for CNS gene therapy.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for
    this article, electronic drafts are retrievable by anonymous ftp from
    princeton.edu according to the instructions below (the filenames are
    bbs.sinden bbs.stein and bbs.neuwelt). Please do not prepare a
    commentary on these drafts. Just let us know, after having inspected them,
    what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect
    of each article.
    -------------------------------------------------------------
    To retrieve a file by ftp from a Unix/Internet site, type either:
    ftp princeton.edu
    or
    ftp 128.112.128.1
    When you are asked for your login, type:
    anonymous
    Enter password as per instructions (make sure to include the specified @),
    and then change directories with:
    cd /pub/harnad/BBS
    To show the available files, type:
    ls
    Next, retrieve the file you want with (for example):
    get bbs.sinden
    When you have the file(s) you want, type:
    quit
    In case of doubt or difficulty, consult your system manager.
    A more elaborate version of these instructions for the U.K. is
    available on request (thanks to Brian Josephson).

    The files are also retrievable through archie, gopher, veronica, etc.
    ----------
    Where the above procedures are not available (e.g. from Bitnet or other
    networks), there are two fileservers:
    ftpmail@decwrl.dec.com
    and
    bitftp@pucc.bitnet
    that will do the transfer for you. To one or the
    other of them, send the following one line message:

    help

    for instructions (which will be similar to the above, but will be in
    the form of a series of lines in an email message that ftpmail or
    bitftp will then execute for you).
    -------------------------------------------------------------
Working...
X