Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prosthetic sprinter

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Prosthetic sprinter

    Since the prostheses are not powered machines and they don't give
    back more than you put in, and I believe less than what a muscle can
    do, I see no problem. The only real advantage is that they make the
    athlete relatively lighter. I suppose the same would be true for an
    upper-body amputee. Should we also deny them participation?

    There is an IAAF rule that prohibits "springs" in shoes (see below)
    This situation must fall into that category. That rule is very old
    and probably was ill-conceived. It seems that springs are now built
    into the track as compared to the old cinder tracks that essential
    could not return energy. At least with tracks everyone gets the same advantage.

    Here is the rule as of 2004.
    Shoes
    2. Athletes may compete barefoot or with footwear on one or both
    feet. The purpose of shoes for competition is to give protection and
    stability to the feet and a firm grip on the ground. Such shoes,
    however, must not be constructed so as to give an athlete any
    additional assistance, and no spring or device of any kind may be
    incorporated in the shoes. A shoe strap over the instep is permitted.


    -----
    D. Gordon E. Robertson, PhD, FCSB
    Professor of Biomechanics
    School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1N 6N5
    Email: dger@uOttawa.ca
    Phone: +1-613-562-5800 Office: 4253 Lab.: 4246
    Fax: +1-613-562-5149
    Webpage: http://www.health.uottawa.ca/biomech/lab
    Personal: http://myprofile.cos.com/dger
Working...
X