Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Re: Oscar Pistorius

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Oscar Pistorius

    Dear all,

    I agree with Chris and Ton that the issues here are not biomechanical. They
    are about what constitutes fair competition and hence the issues are about
    the ethics of sport.

    Can I remind readers of the e-mail Chris sent to the list last year
    http://flyingjumper.com/homeflash.html. Here are a pair of devices that are
    not all that dissimilar from modern energy returning prostheses but designed
    to be worn by an able bodied person. How would the IAAF react to an able
    bodied athlete turning up for competition wearing these? From the video
    there is a distinct suggestion that high jump records might be at stake (or
    maybe not if you subtract the height of the device from the height of the
    jump).

    To my mind if you want to introduce aids whether they be prostheses or
    wheelchairs into sport you have a different competition (not necessarily
    superior or inferior, just different). The simplest example of this is that
    if you allow a crutch during a high jump competition then you will end up
    with the pole vault.

    Which brings us back to the new Speedo swimwear - should all athletes be
    required to perform naked?

    Richard

    Richard Baker PhD CEng CSci
    Director Gait CCRE/Gait Analysis Service manager
    Murdoch Childrens Research Institute
    Royal Childrens Hospital
    Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia

    Tel (+613) 9345 5354, Fax (+613) 9345 5447

    -----Original Message-----
    From: * Biomechanics and Movement Science listserver
    [mailto:BIOMCH-L@NIC.SURFNET.NL] On Behalf Of Alena Grabowski
    Sent: Tuesday, 20 May 2008 10:47 AM
    To: BIOMCH-L@NIC.SURFNET.NL
    Subject: [BIOMCH-L] Oscar Pistorius

    We, the scientific group that has refuted the claims of the IAAF,
    believe that it is relevant to make the following points based on
    recent commentary from the Biomch-L list regarding the CAS's ruling
    to overturn the IAAF's decision that banned Oscar Pistorius from
    international able-bodied competition:

    1. The work conducted by our group was done pro bono. None of us
    received compensation for our research or participation in the
    hearing. The legal team selected our group from many other willing
    scientists. All of us were screened and cleared for any potential
    conflicts of interest by the lawyers. In addition, Rodger Kram and
    Hugh Herr were judged to not have any conflict of interest by the CAS
    court.
    2. Our group of scientists was asked to evaluate the scientific
    claims made by the IAAF that resulted in the banning of Oscar Pistorius.
    3. We evaluated the claims by using data from the literature, as well
    as our own data collected at Rice University.
    4. As Ton has stated, this ruling applies only to Oscar and to the
    Cheetah prosthetics, thus any new prosthetic running technology will
    have to be re-evaluated before being allowed in IAAF competition.
    5. We plan to publish the data that we have collected in a peer-
    reviewed journal as soon as possible.
    6. We hope that the interest in the Oscar Pistorius case will result
    in a number of further studies into questions regarding the
    biomechanical and energetic effects of prosthetics on human walking
    and running.

    Our group includes Drs. Hugh Herr, Peter Weyand, Rodger Kram, Matthew
    Bundle, Craig McGowan, and Alena Grabowski.

    Alena Grabowski, PhD
    Postdoctoral Associate
    Biomechatronics Laboratory
    MIT Media Lab
    http://web.media.mit.edu/~alenag

Working...
X