Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What is work technique?:Summary

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What is work technique?:Summary

    Dear BIOMCH-L readers,

    A fortnight ago I proposed a discussion on the topic "What is work
    technique?" and raised some questions concerning possible definitions,
    appropriate biomechanical variables and measurement methods, related areas
    etc. I received two answers which are given below and for which I want to
    express my gratitude:

    Hei Lars,

    kan jeg foreslaa at du ser paa arbeidet til N. A. Bernstein, russisk
    fysiolog som forsket mye med arbeidsbevegelser og arbeidteknikk i
    Sovjet i 1950-tallet? Jeg arbeider i idrettsteknikk med jeg finner
    Bernsteins oppfatninger fremdeles de beste modeler.
    Spennede fraagar, lykke til.

    james major
    motor behavior laboratory
    university of utah
    jmajor@deans.health.utah.edu

    ===============================================
    Lars

    Here are some quick thoughts regarding your first two questions
    regarding work technique:

    I may respond later to the other questions, depending on other peoples
    contributions.

    >1) How can "work technique" be (operationally) defined in a biomechanical
    >perspective.
    >
    >2) Applying this definition to manual material handling, which biomechanical
    >variables would be most appropriate for analyzing and evaluating work
    >technique? How can these variables be measured?
    >

    1) The whole question of how to describe techniques is clearly very
    complex. I suggest that it is more meaningful to use verbal
    descriptions of what the technique involves rather than to produce
    highly complex sequences of numbers or formulae. This means that in
    most circumstances numerical comparisons of techniques will not be
    appropriate. (Perhaps only when they are similar techniques which
    differ on only one or two measures.)

    2) Biomechanical variables relevant to manual materials handling
    technique should include some measure of the 'smoothness' of lift. Thus
    velocity and acceleration suggest themselves. Secondary measures such
    as EMG and IAP would be useful to determine which parts of the body are
    involved in the technique. Foloowing on from this, methods for
    describing the synchronisation of the movements would be very useful.


    I hope this stimulates discussion.


    Andrew Pinder
    Ergonomics and Work Psychology Section Phone: + 44 114 289 2594
    Health and Safety Laboratory Fax: + 44 114 289 2526
    Broad Lane email: apinder@ewps-hsl.demon.co.uk
    Sheffield S3 7HQ
    UK

    ===============================================

    The first answer is from James Major and is written in a Scandinavian
    language. He works with techniques in sport and reminds us about the Russian
    physiologist Nicholas Bernstein, whose models he finds still are the best.

    Independent of my inquiry there was a mail from Mark Latash to the BIOMCH-List:
    "...On this year, the year of Bernstein centenary, we would like to share with
    you a very appealing suggestion made recently by Esther Thelen: Those of us
    studying movement should be required to reread Bernstein (a paper or a
    Chapter) at least once a year. This is going to be a disciplinary "day of
    atonement" when we recall all the times during the past year when we
    thought we had an original idea, only to be reminded of the encompassing
    legacy of Bernstein's genius...."

    Mark Latash was chairman of the organizing committee of the Conference
    "Bernstein's Traditions in Motor Control" August 22-25 at Pennsylvania
    State University. It seems that the Bernstein legacy is of enormous
    importance for motor control research.

    However, although there is an immense activity in the science of human
    movement and motor control, there are obviously few attempts to connect this
    research to the work technique concept in occupational biomechanics. Maybe
    the reason is that, as Andrew Pinder (who sent the second reply) wrote, "The
    whole question of how to describe techniques is clearly very complex."

    Sincerely

    Lars
    ****************

    Lars Lindbeck, Ph. D.
    National Institute for Working Life
    S-171 84 SOLNA, Sweden
    Tel: +46-8-730 9309, Telefax: +46-8-730 1967, +46-8-27 35 05
    E-mail: Lars.Lindbeck@niwl.se
Working...
X