Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Summary Sex diff in hand proportion

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Summary Sex diff in hand proportion

    Here is the reply on my request. I like to thank everybody very much.

    M.I. Christel

    On Fri, 14 Aug 1998 20:53:45 +0100

    I wrote:

    > We did a study on the kinematics (Optotrac northern digital) of
    > reach-to-grasp movements towards small objects and found significant sex
    > differences (5 females, 5 males) in the thumb-forefinger aperture while
    > preparing the grip. We assume, that these sex differences are due to hand
    > morphology, thus due to the proportional part of thumb and fore finger.
    > Did anybody similar studies? Could there be other reasons than the
    > morphology for these differences? I would be pleased about references and
    > other communication? Of course, I will post a summary of replies.
    > Thanks
    >
    >
    > M. I. Christel, PHD
    > Free University of Berlin
    > Biology
    > Anthropology
    > Fabeckstr. 15
    > D-14195 Berlin
    > Germany

    While you may be correct in your assumptions concerning sex differences in
    morphology, you may want to consider Dyspraxia (Clumsy child syndrome)
    which is estimated to affect 8% of children here in the UK. Although, in a
    small sample like yours it is doubtful that you would have affected
    subjects.Some of the features of this syndrome are: laxity of ligaments,
    poor proprioception, and poor hand-eye coordination. It seems to affect
    male children more than female.
    Yours,
    Ian Rogers M.Med.Sci.

    232, Broomhall St,
    Sheffield S3 7SQ
    UK

    Tel 0114 276 1018
    From: Francisco Valero-Cuevas
    Subject: Re: Sex diff in hand proportion
    To: mchriste@zedat.fu-berlin.de
    Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 14:32:03 -0700 (PDT)

    One study has reported gender differences in hand anatomy:

    Ateshian, G.A., M.P. Rosenwasser, and V.C. Mow, Curvature
    characteristics and congruence of the thumb carpometacarpal joint:
    Differences between female and male joints. Journal of Biomechanics,
    1992. 25(6): p. 591-607.

    But did not study its effect on kinematics. This may be one
    contributing factor to the differences you see.

    Another study that may be of use to you:

    Buchholz, B., T.J. Armstrong, and S.A. Goldstein,
    Anthropometric data for describing the kinematics of the human hand.
    Ergonomics, 1992. 35(3): p. 261-73.

    You may want to find out if Johansson has found gender differences in
    his studies:

    Johansson, R., Sensory and memory information in the control
    of dexterous manipulation, in Neural bases of motor behaviour, F.
    Lacqaniti and P. Viviani, Editors. 1996, Kluwer Academic Publishers:
    Netherlands. p. 205-260.

    Good Luck,

    -Francisco

    ************************************************** *************
    Francisco Valero-Cuevas, PhD

    Research Associate and Lecturer Biomedical Engineer
    Biomechanical Engineering Division VA Palo Alto HCS
    Mechanical Engineering Department Rehab. R&D Center (153)
    Stanford University
    3801 Miranda Ave
    Palo Alto, CA
    94304-1200
    (mailing address)

    (650) 493-5000 ext 66254; (650) 493-4919 FAX
    valero@roses.stanford.edu
    http://www.stanford.edu/~fvalero
    ************************************************** *************

    -------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe send UNSUBSCRIBE BIOMCH-L to LISTSERV@nic.surfnet.nl
    For information and archives: http://www.bme.ccf.org/isb/biomch-l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------
Working...
X