Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Summary treadmill vs. overground

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Summary treadmill vs. overground

    Dear Biomech-list members,
    First of all I will thank to the people sending such helpfull informations.
    Special thanks to Christian Calame from KISTLER Instruments, Switzerland,
    for the literature support and special thanks to Hans Savelberg, Maastricht
    University, for the papers.

    The question:

    >Dear Biomch-list members,
    >I want to measure the differences between treadmill and overground walking
    with >the 3-D Motion Analysis System from ZEBRIS.
    >Study design:
    >- Differences in general gait paramter (step length/width, stance/swing
    phase, >stide length, etc.)
    >- Kinematic analysis of the lower extremities and pelvis.
    >- Adaptation during treadmill walking
    >- Differences between unimpaired persons and ACL-deficient, disc herniated
    and ankle impaired >people.

    >Has anybody measured kinetic, kinematic and EMG differences in this special
    case?
    >If anybody has additional ideas, please let me know. I'll send a summary of
    the received informations.

    Thanks in advance Frank Mueller



    ***********************************************
    * Frank Mueller *
    * Movement Therapist *
    * Ladenburger Str.80 *
    * 69120 Heidelberg *
    * Germany *
    * Phone: +49 6221-475388 *
    * e-mail: Frank.Mueller@urz.uni-heidelberg.de *
    * *
    ***********************************************

    The answers:

    Dear Frank,

    Not really much help to you, I would guess, but I recently did a
    treadmill lab for my sports students:

    http://www.rs.polyu.edu.hk/gaitlab/sports/Default.htm

    I did calculate segment energies and powers but no joint kinetics, I'm
    afraid. I tried putting the treadmill on a force plate (which will work
    for running, since there is no double support), but wasn't very
    impressed with the results. Our plates are AMTI - I think Kistler would
    work better as preloading doesn't affect piezo-electric load cells.

    I presume you have seen At Hof's paper J. EMG & Kin. 2 (4): 203-216?

    Chris
    --
    Dr. Chris Kirtley MD PhD
    Dept. of Rehabilitation Sciences
    The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
    Hong Kong
    Special Administrative Region of The People's Republic of China

    Tel: +852 2766 4830 Fax: 2330 8656
    Home: http://www.polyu.edu.hk/~rs/kirt/index.htm
    PolyU Gait Lab: http://www.rs.polyu.edu.hk/gaitlab

    Clinical Gait Analysis: http://www.polyu.edu.hk/cga
    Send subscribe/unsubscribe to listproc@info.curtin.edu.au
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Dear Mr. Mueller,

    >From a survey I allready conducted, I have found no complete study about
    treadmill vs. overground locomotion.

    Such a comparison seems to be very complex to establish: Mathematically,
    there is no
    difference between treadmill and overground walking; In fact, each of the
    following
    points plays a non negligible role:

    - quality of the treadmill (constant speed over heel contact for example),
    - determination of the "comfortable" speed
    - habituation mode
    - psychological effect
    - proprioception (vibrations of the treadmill on the feet)

    Here are some references, which can help to design the study:

    Dufek J., Bates B.T.
    Plantar pressure differences between overground and treadmill walking.
    Am. Alliance of Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance Conf.
    1988 ? ? New Orleans

    Winter D.A.
    Calculation and interpretation of mechanical energy of movement.
    Ex. Sp. Sc. Rev. or Br. Sp. Sc. Rev.
    1978 6 183-201

    Wall J.C., Charteris J.
    The process of habituation to treadmill walking at different velocities.
    Ergonomics
    1980 23 425-435

    Wall J.C., Charteris J.
    A kinematic study of long-term habituation of treadmill walking.
    Ergonomics
    1982 24 531-542

    Pearce M.E., Cunningham D.A., Donner A.P., Rechnitzer P.A., et al.
    Energy cost of treadmill and floor walking at self-selected paces.
    European Journal of Applied Physiology
    1983 52 115-119

    Charteris J., Taves C.
    The process of habituation to treadmill walking : a kinematic analysis.
    J. Percept. Mot. Skills
    1978 47 659-666

    Parker G.H.
    Locomotor and spacial differencies between overground and treadmill walking.
    M.Sc. Thesis
    1979 Trent University

    Van-Ingen-Schenau G.J.
    Some fundamental aspects of the biomechanics of over-ground versus
    treadmill locomotion.
    Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.
    1980 12.4 257-261

    Molen N.H., Rozendal R.H.
    Some factors of human gait.
    Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wettenschappen
    1966 Mar 69 522-527

    Whittle M.W.
    Kinematics of treadmill walking.
    Proceedings of the Special Conference of the CSB : Human Locomotion I
    1980 Oct 1 30-31
    Canadian Society for Biomechanics (CSB), London, Ontario, Canada.

    Wall J.C, Charteris J.
    A kinematic study of the long-term process of habituation to treadmill walking.
    Proceedings of the Special Conference of the CSB : Human Locomotion I
    1980 Oct 1 32-33
    Canadian Society for Biomechanics (CSB) London, Ontario, Canada.

    Alton F., Baldey L., Caplan S., Morrissey M.C.
    A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking.
    Clinical Biomechanics
    1998 Jul 13.6 434-440

    Barrey E., Galloux P., Valette J.P., Auvinet B., Wolter R.
    Determination of the optimal treadmill slope for reproducing the same cardiac
    response in saddle horses as overground exercise conditions.
    Vet. Rec.
    1993 Aug 133.8 183-185

    Best regards,

    E. Cordier

    __________________________________________________ _____________________

    (Dr.) Emmanuel CORDIER - Head of the 'Foot & Ankle Group'

    Institut fuer Experimentelle Chirurgie der Universitaet Ulm.
    Abteilung Unfallchirurgische Forschung und Biomechanik.

    Helmholtzstrasse 14,
    89081 ULM - GERMANY

    Phone : +49 (0)731 . 50 . 22908 or +49 (0)731 . 50 . 23481

    Fax : +49 (0)731 . 50 . 23498

    Email : emmanuel.cordier@medizin.uni-ulm.de

    WWW : http://lyra.medizin.uni-ulm.de

    __________________________________________________ _____________________



    Dear Mr. Mueller

    Via regular mail we will send you several articles on treadmill versus
    overground locomotion with a particular focus on ground reaction forces.
    We have done some research on treadmill gait analysis when we developed
    the Gaitway Instrumented Treadmill which contains force plates for
    ground reaction force measurement.

    Best Regards
    Christian Calame
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    Mr. Christian Calame, Product Manager Biomechanics
    Kistler Instrumente AG Winterthur, P.O.Box 304,
    CH-8408 Winterthur, Switzerland
    Tel: +41 52 224 11 11, Fax: +41 52 224 14 14
    E-Mail: cl@kistler.ch, http://www.kistler.ch/biomech
    -----------------------------------------------------------


    Dear colleague,
    It may interest you what has been done in Nijmegen. Look at Jacques
    Duysens, j.duysens@mbfys.kun.nl,
    for instance in Gait & Posture 7 (1998) 131-141, and 251-263.
    Greetings, Hans Vos.
    --
    ================================================== =====================
    Dr. J.E. Vos | e-mail: j.e.vos@med.rug.nl
    Groningen University | s-mail: Bloemsingel 10
    Department of Medical Physiology | 9712 KZ Groningen
    | The Netherlands
    | phone : +31 50 3613534
    | fax : +31 50 3632751
    ================================================== =====================

    Dear Frank,

    We did some work on comparing overground and treadmill locomotion in both
    horses and man. I sent you by mail a copy of a paper that recently appeared
    in Gait and Posture vol. 7, 1998 p26-34 [human], and a paper that has been
    published in Veterinary Quarterly, vol 16 suppl 2, 1994, p. s87-s90
    [equine]. Both papers contain an extended list of references in literature
    on this topic.

    Hans H.C.M. Savelberg Ph.D.
    Department of Human Movement Sciences
    Faculty of Health Sciences
    Maastricht University
    P.O.box 616
    NL-6200 MD MAASTRICHT
    The Netherlands
    phone: +31.43.388.1392
    fax: +31.43.367.0972
    email: hans.savelberg@bw.unimaas.nl
    ------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dr. Mueller,
    I collected a few articles on this topic a while ago, here are two of the
    better ones.

    AU - Murray MP
    AU - Spurr GB
    AU - Sepic SB
    AU - Gardner GM
    AU - Mollinger LA
    TI - Treadmill vs. floor walking: kinematics, electromyogram, and heart rate.
    DP - 1985 Jul
    IS - 8750-7587
    TA - J Appl Physiol
    PG - 87-91
    AB - To identify the degree of difference between treadmill and floor
    walking, kinematic, electromyographic (EMG), and heart rate
    measurements were recorded in seven normal female subjects during
    walking at three speeds on the treadmill and on the floor. During
    treadmill walking, subjects tended to use a faster cadence and shorter
    stride length than during floor walking. In addition the displacements
    of the head, hip, and ankle in the sagittal plane showed statistically
    significant differences between floor and treadmill walking. Average
    EMG activity was usually greater on the treadmill than on the floor;
    however, this difference was only significant for the quadriceps. Heart
    rate was significantly higher during fast treadmill walking than floor
    walking. In general, treadmill walking was not found to differ markedly
    from floor walking in kinematic measurements or EMG patterns.
    SO - J Appl Physiol 1985 Jul;59(1):87-91


    Ergonomics 1986 May;29(5):665-676
    Treadmill versus walkway locomotion in humans: an EMG study.
    Arsenault AB, Winter DA, Marteniuk RG




    ************************************************** ***********
    Gordon Chalmers, Ph.D.
    Dept. of Physical Education, Health and Recreation
    Western Washington University, MS-9067
    Bellingham WA
    U.S.A.
    98225-9067

    chalmers@cc.wwu.edu
    http://www.wwu.edu/~chalmers
    Phone: (360) 650-3113
    FAX: (360) 650-7447
    ---------------------------------------------------------------

    Check: Blaszczky and Loeb (1993) Physiology and Behavior, vol.
    53:501-507; and Barrey et al. (1993) Acta Anatomica vol. 146:90-94
    (and various references therein).

    Susan Larson

    Dept. of Anatomical Sciences
    University at Stony Brook
    Stony Brook, NY 11794-8081
    ph: (516) 444-3115
    Email SLarson@mail.som.sunysb.edu
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    If you're going to do this, why not also measure plantar forces? Contact
    Novel GmbH in Muenchen about using the pedar in-shoe pressure measurement
    system. I think Dr. Axel Kalpen of Novel has done work on treadmills.

    Good luck!

    -- Jeff

    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe send SIGNOFF BIOMCH-L to LISTSERV@nic.surfnet.nl
    For information and archives: http://isb.ri.ccf.org/biomch-l
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
Working...
X