Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Re: 2-D filming question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: 2-D filming question

    Dear Biomch-L readers,

    Phil Cheetham was asking advice regarding calibration of a 2-D
    filming setup. I am not familiar with Jim Walton's 2D DLT
    algorithm, but it seems to be exactly what is needed. I once
    used a 2D DLT to solve a similar problem (analyzing a photograph
    of a horse's hoof on a force plate). The DLT can deal with
    an arbitrary camera position and orientation, and is therefore a
    general and very elegant solution.

    If you substitute Z=0 (defining the sagittal plane) into the
    classical 3D DLT equations, three out of eleven DLT coefficients
    are eliminated. The remaining eight can be determined using four
    (or more) calibration points in the Z=0 plane. I have developed
    two simple Fortran subroutines to do the calibration, and
    (subsequently) to calculate XY coordinates from raw camera data.
    One limitation of my software is, that the calibration routine
    uses exactly four calibration points. It may be possible to
    increase the reliability by using more than four, and solving the
    DLT parameters from an overdetermined system of equations.

    So, my advice is to use a 2D DLT approach. If you do not want to
    start from scratch, my Fortran code is available. One final
    warning: any 2D analysis will depend on the assumption that all
    landmarks remain in the sagittal plane. The results become more
    sensitive to this assumption with a non-perpendicular camera
    view, which increases the parallax errors. From Phil's
    description of the actual situation, it would seem that this is
    not a major problem here.

    -- Ton van den Bogert
    Human Performance Laboratory
    University of Calgary, Canada
Working...
X