Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Re: NT machines versus UNIX machines

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: NT machines versus UNIX machines

    Curt,

    Avoid NT at all costs. DEQ (Compaq/DEC) makes reasonably priced
    workstations with large computation power. We have a 500 MHz, 512 Mb RAM
    workstation in our lab for CFD purposes (turbulence) and it cost about
    $11,000, which is pretty decent for that much computation power. It might
    be cheaper these days.

    Why am I so down on NT? Well, NT is not as stable of an operating system
    as UNIX, UNIX security is far superior and, personally, I hate the Windows
    OS. Microsoft continues to change the operating system, NT2000; which
    doesn't allow you to go back to an earlier version or so I was told by a
    colleague who tried to load it for computational work. He found he had to
    clear his hard drive and start new with the old OS, gave up when that
    didn't work so well and went to Linux instead.

    For raw computing power, I'd go with the UNIX workstation. E-mail me
    personally if you want more info on the machines we have here in our lab.

    My take on NT -- it stands for Nice Try, Next Time, Nothing There?

    Good luck,

    Tim
    berger@seas.ucla.edu

    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe send SIGNOFF BIOMCH-L to LISTSERV@nic.surfnet.nl
    For information and archives: http://isb.ri.ccf.org/biomch-l
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
Working...
X