Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Re: NT machines versus UNIX machines (fwd)

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: NT machines versus UNIX machines (fwd)

    Hi

    I would also prefer to use UNIX instead of windows but....

    The administration of a UNIX system is not like windows, especially if
    you do not have technical support from your university.

    After all NT, is not as bad as 95/98. If one application crashes, NT
    will not necessarily die, in most cases you just terminate the
    application.

    Thanks

    Giannis


    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Biomechanics and Movement Science listserver
    > [mailto:BIOMCH-L@NIC.SURFNET.NL]On Behalf Of edward auyang
    > Sent: 28 October 1999 16:09
    > To: BIOMCH-L@NIC.SURFNET.NL
    > Subject: Re: NT machines versus UNIX machines (fwd)
    >
    >
    > I'm a die-hard Unix person from the start, so my opinion
    > may be somewhat
    > biased, but I think my reasoning behind it is all well-founded.
    >
    > 1. Unix is an inherently more stable operating system than
    > NT. You have
    > much more control over running processes and multiple
    > processes in Unix
    > than in NT. ie, if you are running multiple windows doing different
    > calculations, and one of them crashes, you won't lose the
    > other processes
    > (as opposed to NT which would probably die on you).
    >
    > 2. Unix machines (ie, SGI's, SunSparc's, DEC's) are designed to be
    > calculation/mathematically intensive processors. Even
    > though you may not
    > be doing much graphics work (of which, Unix workstations
    > are often used
    > for), graphics manipulation is essentially all mathematical
    > calculations.
    > When I did Cardiac MRI and Brain PET/MRI analysis, we
    > always used SGI's or
    > SunSparcs because when it came down to it, they were more
    > reliable and
    > faster.
    >
    > 3. Unix is an ideal multi-user/networking platform. Though NT is
    > "designed for multi-user access", Unix truly is. It's
    > significantly more
    > secure, your file sharing and permissions can be managed
    > alot better, and
    > remote access is more simple. The workstation would also
    > make an ideal
    > server if you wanted your own web-server (or had other
    > machines running
    > linux that you want to rhost to).
    >
    > I'd say the only advantage of using an NT station over a
    > Unix based one is
    > cost. Another slight advantage is the availability of word
    > processors or
    > other"regular" application software, but I'm sure you
    > already have other
    > systems that satisfy that task.
    >
    > Hope this helps.
    >
    > Ed
    >
    > Edward Auyang || auyanged@email.uc.edu
    > Biomechanics and Ergonomics Laboratories
    > Department of Environmental Health
    > University of Cincinnati Medical Center
    >
    > On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Curt G. DeGroff wrote:
    >
    > > Dear BIOMCH subscribers:
    > > To those of you who do heavy computational work.
    > > Where are we (collectively if I may) going in regards
    > to NT machines versus
    > > UNIX machines?
    > > I need to buy a new workstation with lots of
    > computational horse power. I am
    > > not concerned so much with graphics. Most of the CFD or
    > FEA software packages
    > > that we use support NT or UNIX (SGI, SUN, etc) and do
    > not yet support things
    > > like LINUX. I hate Windows NT but like many it may be
    > time to see the writing on
    > > the wall.
    > > Any thoughts?
    > > Thanks.
    > >
    > > --
    > >
    > > Curt G. DeGroff, M.D.
    > > degroff.curt@tchden.org
    > > University of Colorado - Health Science Center
    > > The Children's Hospital, Denver
    > > Pediatric Cardiology
    > > Cardiovascular Flow Laboratory
    > > (303) 764-8473
    > > (303) 837-2595 FAX
    > >
    > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
    > > To unsubscribe send SIGNOFF BIOMCH-L to LISTSERV@nic.surfnet.nl
    > > For information and archives: http://isb.ri.ccf.org/biomch-l
    > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
    > >
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe send SIGNOFF BIOMCH-L to LISTSERV@nic.surfnet.nl
    > For information and archives: http://isb.ri.ccf.org/biomch-l
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------
    >

    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe send SIGNOFF BIOMCH-L to LISTSERV@nic.surfnet.nl
    For information and archives: http://isb.ri.ccf.org/biomch-l
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
Working...
X