Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Standards for metal on metal prostheses

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Standards for metal on metal prostheses

    Dear BIOMCH_L subscribers

    As part of a new two piece prosthesis design we are favouring the use of
    cobalt-chrome on cobalt-chrome articulation. Is anyone aware of any
    standards, formal or informal, which govern tribological factors such as
    surface roughness, sphericity, and diametral clearance.

    I am aware of the extensive literature re metal-metal articulation, but I
    cannot find any specific design guidelines such as " for a particular
    diameter head subjected to a load level X, the surface roughness should be
    ........, the sphericity should be ............., and the diametral
    clearance should be .............. . I am aware of the ASTM standards which
    don't seem to cover this and that it is desirable to minimise surface
    roughness, sphericity and diametral clearance but what are the maximum
    allowable numbers?

    If anyone has references explaining modern manufacturing techniques for
    Co-Chrome (ie producing highly accurate spheres and incredibly low surface
    roughness 5nm) it would be greatly appreciated

    Looking forward to any replies

    Dan Barker
    Research Engineer
    Dan.Barker@rgh.sa.gov.au

    ---------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe send SIGNOFF BIOMCH-L to LISTSERV@nic.surfnet.nl
    For information and archives: http://isb.ri.ccf.org/biomch-l
    ---------------------------------------------------------------
Working...
X