Dear all,
we are actually conducting research on thorax muscle activation (obliquii ext & int, rect. abdominis and quadratus lumborum) during different core stability exercises to determine mean muscle activity. Aim is to determine which exercises yield highest muscle activies per exercises.
In other research we used a metronome to achive quasi similar rates of motion between all exercises and it was quite simple to standardize movement time intervals and speed. We now try to compare muscle mean activities between exercises with different lengths in time intervals, because it is not possible to standardize all exercises to the same metronome beat. I know that time normalization may be a possible way to overcome this problem, but I´m also aware that it will have an influence on the data.
I would like to have some other opinion about how to process this data - when mean muscle activity between different time intervals is compared (where differences are more than 20% between tasks)?
Many thanks,
Brian
we are actually conducting research on thorax muscle activation (obliquii ext & int, rect. abdominis and quadratus lumborum) during different core stability exercises to determine mean muscle activity. Aim is to determine which exercises yield highest muscle activies per exercises.
In other research we used a metronome to achive quasi similar rates of motion between all exercises and it was quite simple to standardize movement time intervals and speed. We now try to compare muscle mean activities between exercises with different lengths in time intervals, because it is not possible to standardize all exercises to the same metronome beat. I know that time normalization may be a possible way to overcome this problem, but I´m also aware that it will have an influence on the data.
I would like to have some other opinion about how to process this data - when mean muscle activity between different time intervals is compared (where differences are more than 20% between tasks)?
Many thanks,
Brian
Comment