Hello,
I'm currently working on 3d coordinates of sprinters and I would like to smooth the data. I'm using a second order Butterworth filter with the Challis (1990) method to find the cut-off frequency.
The program I am using accepts cut-off frequencies between 0 and half of the Nyquist frequency. In the literature (Winter 1990), I found that the frequency can be between 0 and the Nyquist frequency. I believe taking half of it is a precaution but does anyone know the actual reason for this, or has any references talking about it.
Thanks a lot for your help
Arnaud
I'm currently working on 3d coordinates of sprinters and I would like to smooth the data. I'm using a second order Butterworth filter with the Challis (1990) method to find the cut-off frequency.
The program I am using accepts cut-off frequencies between 0 and half of the Nyquist frequency. In the literature (Winter 1990), I found that the frequency can be between 0 and the Nyquist frequency. I believe taking half of it is a precaution but does anyone know the actual reason for this, or has any references talking about it.
Thanks a lot for your help
Arnaud
Comment